Barriers to Fair and Effective Congressional Representation in Indian Country

Barriers to Fair and Effective Congressional Representation in Indian Country

Dina Gilio-Whitaker

Volume 12, Number 1 (2025) 12 (1): 81-92


Keywords Native Americans, Congressional Representation, Federal Indian Policy, Sovereignty, Settler Colonialism, Tribal Nations, Plenary Power Doctrine, Assimilationist Policies, Indigenous Peoples, Self-Determination, Political Participation in Indian Country, Native American Sovereignty, Historical Mistreatment of Native Peoples, Challenges in Political Engagement

Abstract

Native American tribal nations may have survived in the face of 500 years of violent displacement as a result of European colonization, but have undergone profound changes to their land bases and ways of life. Settler colonialism is an imposed structure within which tribes have been forced to negotiate their circumstances, with Congress being one of the primary instruments of the settler state. This essay argues that there are several barriers inherent in the political system that precludes fair and effective Congressional representation, and that there are certain fundamental problems associated with tribes’ limiting themselves to working within the domestic system.

Authors

Dina Gilio-Whitaker

Published August 13, 2025

How to Cite

Barriers to Fair and Effective Congressional Representation in Indian Country. (2025). Fourth World Journal, 12(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.63428/1ehrcp29

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfred, T. (2002). Sovereignty. In J. Barker (Ed.), Sovereignty Matters: Locations of Contestation and Possibility in Indigenous Struggles for Self-Determination (pp. 33-50). University of Nebraska Press.

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1dnncqc.5

Anti-Indian Sovereignty Movement and it's Politicians (Editors Report). (2002, February 22). Indian Country Today. Retrieved from http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/content.cfm?id=1014391922&print=yes

Barker, J. (2005). For Whom Sovereignty Matters. In J. Barker (Ed.), Sovereignty Matters: Locations of Contestation and Possibility in Indigenous Struggles for Self-Determination (pp. 1-31). University of Nebraska Press.

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1dnncqc.4

Berkhofer, R. F. (1978). The White Man's Indian: Images of the American Indian From Columbus to the Present. Vintage Books (Random House).

Corntassel, J., & Witmer, R. C. (2008). Forced Federalism: Contemporary Challenges to Indigenous Nationhood. University of Oklahoma Press.

Crawford, R. (1998, Fall). The Anti-Indian Movement. Western States Center Views, A Journal of News and Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.speedy.uscpdx.org/publications/views/views18/anti-indian.pdf

Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780195301731.013.51089

Deloria, P. J. (1998). Playing Indian. Yale University Press.

https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300153606

Deloria, V. (1969). Custer Died For Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto. University of Oklahoma Press.

Garcia-Alix, L. (2003). The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues: IWGIA Handbook. IWGIA.

Hauptman, L. (1992). Congress, Plenary Power, and the American Indians. In Exiled in the Land of the Free (pp. 317-336). Clearlight Publishers.

Hawkesworth, M. (2003). Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 529-550.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000868

History of the Tribal Self-Governance Initiative. (2007, December 3). Tribal Self-Governance. Retrieved from http://www.tribalselfgov.org/Red%20Book/The%20History%20&%20Goals/history_of_the_tribal_self.htm

Huhndorf, S. M. (2001). Going Native: Indians in the American Cultural Imagination. Cornell University Press.

Kegley, C. W., & Raymond, G. A. (2005). The Global Future. Thomson Wadsworth.

La Duke, W. (2005). Imperial Anthropology. In Recovering the Sacred. South End Press.

Lintner, T. (2004). The Savage and the Slave: Critical Race Theory, Racial Stereotyping, and the Teaching of American History. Journal of Social Studies Research, 28(1), 27-32.

https://doi.org/10.1177/235227982004028001003

Newcomb, S. (2007, February 2). Anti-Indian Rhetoric in the 21st Century. Indian Country Today. Retrieved from http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/content.cfm?id=1096414433&print=yes

Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. University of Otago Press.

Stubben, J. D. (2006). Native Americans and Political Participation: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO.

https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400689819

The History of Critical Race Theory. (2007, September 11). College of Education, University of Texas. Retrieved from http://www.db.utexas.edu/faculty/scheurich/proj7/crthistory.htm

United Nations Human Rights Committee International Covenant on Civil Rights Report. (2006, October 12). Indian Law Resource Center. Retrieved from http://www.indianlaw.org/un_hr_committee1.html

U.S. Census Bureau American Fact Finder Fact Sheet: United States 2006 American Community Survey Profile Highlights. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.factfinder.census.gov

Wilkins, D. (2007). American Indian Politics and the American Political System (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Wilkinson, C. (2005). Blood Struggle: The Rise of Modern Indian Nations. Norton.

Williams, R. A. (2005). Like a Loaded Weapon: The Rehnquist Court, Indian Rights, and the Legal History of Racism In America. University of Minnesota Press.

https://doi.org/10.5749/j.cttttd8v

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Submissions